“I'm angry that in the land of freedom, Americans are still denied access to dozens of effective cancer treatments that are available in other countries around the world (…) I'm angry that the Food and Drug Administration denies people's rights to choose their own treatments (…) I'm angry that the Federal Government has failed to test a single alternative cancer treatment, despite years of efforts (…) I'm angry about the Mafia-like control of the cancer field by the drug industry, through their domination of virtually every single cancer research and treatment institution (…) I'm angry that the "scientific" studies of new drugs, funded by huge companies, almost always turn in favorable results and are approved by the FDA”.

Dr Ralph W. Moss, Director of  Cancerdecisions”, formerly from the Sloan Kettering cancer institute).

Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body”. THE HONORABLE  Justice CARDOZO et al, in  SCHLOENDORFF v. SOCIETY OF N.Y. HOSP., 211 N.Y. 125, 129, 105 N.E. 92, 93 (1914)

“(the right to privacy)…prevents the state from interfering with a person’s choice of treatment on the sole ground that the person has chosen a treatment which the states considers “ineffective” (People v Privitera, 23 Cal 3d at 705 (1979) The HONORABLE Judge Rose Bird (a cancer survivor).

"We see no reason why a patient should not be allowed to make an informed decision to go outside currently approved medical methods in search of an unconventional treatment”. (Second Circuit US Court of Appeals, in the landmark “Schneider v Revici case dated 1987).

“The popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is considerable: the one year prevalence of CAM (Complementary and Alternative medicine)  usage is  42 percent in the United States” Eisenberg David et al, Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States. JAMA 1998:280:1569-75 ….“For the first time, cancer has surpassed heart disease as the top killer of Americans under 85…” (American Cancer Society’s annual report,  January 2005).

CANCER, EFFICIENT ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES, MEDICINE, SCIENCE AND THE LAW

WHEN THE FOOD AND DRUG AGENCY (F.D.A.) AND CANCER DOCTORS REFUSE TO RECOGNIZE VALIDITY OF ALTERNATIVE (OR INTEGRATIVE) ONCOLOGY, IS THIS A DEVIATION FROM SCIENCE AND THE STANDARD OF CARE?

By Christian Pierre Joubert 

VIS MÉDICATRIX NATURAE

  WITH SEVEN YEARS OF CANCER MALPRACTICE PLEADINGS

hunza

Above, the “CANCER-FREE”  Hunza People From the Himalaya, who have been closely studied regarding whom physicians have confirmed for a long time  that  “The Hunzas have no known incidence of cancer” (Dr Robert McCarrison, AMA Journal, Jan 7, 1922).  In addition,  “ They live well beyond 100 years old and have commonly been known to still father children at the age of 110” (ibid.),  provided they do not adopt the “sad” model  (standard American diet”)  and stay  in their paradisiacal eco-villages close to Nature: Some of their lifestyle conditions -  no pollution and toxic stress, pure and alcalinic water and vibrant healthy foods rich in rubidium and potassium, clean  & ozonated air, rich humus-topsoil, medium mountain altitude, exercises, sun, plant-based diet, with lots of fiber and apricots (eating  the  nitriloside-amygdalin rich kernel as well).

 

*************************************************

FROM THE BACK COVER

"Whenever i had patients with abnormal imaging studies I consider my duty to inform them about the results, no matter how bad they were and it is imperative,  necessary and i consider inexcusable behavior not to follow up abnormal imaging findings, like in the case of J. Joubert, with the best medical technologies available like CT scans, MRI". DR Guillermo BRENA, MD, plaintiff's expert in the Northwest Hospital et al case (Retired internist, former Harvard oncologist, author and expert in “Urinary formiminoglutamic acid excretion in patients with neoplastic disease” (Journal of American Cancer Society's "CANCER").
.
“In  retrospect, the Lul (left upper lobe) nodule seen in 1-97 was a small lung cancer and possibly of early stage, but his staging was at the time was incomplete. I think you have a strong case and I also believe you should have a radiologist help you out as an expert”. Dr Eric VALIERE,  Lung cancer director at Swedish cancer institute, Seattle, (plaintiff’s pro bono consultant expert in the Northwest Hospital et al case).

 “While I may be somewhat lax in allowing a certain amount of testimony from the plaintiff regarding non traditional treatment modalities after a cancer has been diagnosed, this would  only be relevant to damages issues (i.e. survivability) ”.  The  Honorable  Judge William Lansing Downing’s Ruling of October 22, 2004,  in the cancer wrongful death case Christian Pierre Joubert v Dr Sanai et al case.

“To further the advancement of Public Health, Justice and Science, while contributing in  meaningfully reversing the cancer and malpractice epidemic, all we would need to do is to convince ONE Judge to allow “cam” (complementary and alternative medicine via expert testimony and fact witnsses)  in the courtroom and then ONE Jury to render a plaintiff's verdict based on three jury instructions: 1:  Medical negligence on the failure to secure a “cam” informed consent on both diagnostic procedures and treatment options. 2:  Medical negligence on the failure to detect and monitor cancer with a “cam” detection and diagnosis work-up.  3: Breach of standard by NOT including a cancer “cam” plan of action.  In this perspective, with a favorable published appellate precedent confirmation on these three instructions,  any “cam”  plaintiff  in the Nation would be able to invoke this case thereby being in a better position to convinced other Courts and Juries to render a truthful  “cam” verdict for their own case.  If this happened, it would be possible to meaningfully contribute to better prosecute and un-mask much of mainstream oncology dogma and activity as "mal-practice". As a result, Society  (public finance) would also benefit as would patients,  insurance companies,  albeit not as much for orthodox  oncologists and their pharmaceutical corporations allies and lawyer partners". Christian Pierre Joubert,  President of "ENLIGHTENED-CONSENT.ORG",  naturopath  and former law teacher.

ENLIGHTENED-CONSENT.ORG PUBLISHING