INDUSTRIAL TOBACCO AND THE LAW
IS ADDITIVES-RICH TOBACCO, ITS MARKETING AND LEGALIZATION A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY ?
By Christian Pierre Joubert
Five years of pleadings and arguments before multiple Courts including the US Supreme Court and the Inter-American Human Rights Commission.
One of the issues before the Court: Knowing (e.g. the "intent" element) that poison-additives in industrial tobacco leads to death, is the manufacturer guilty of homicide ? Even if death is delayed ?
CLICK HERE FOR THE TABLE OF CONTENTS AND A FEW RELEVANT FACTS
TO EXAMINE THE CASE BELOW, CLICK HERE
CASE NO 05-7042
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
CHRISTIAN PIERRE JOUBERT
(Plaintiff-Appellant)
Versus
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
(Defendant-Respondent)
CANCER, EFFICIENT ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES, MEDICINE, SCIENCE AND THE LAW
WHEN THE FOOD AND DRUG AGENCY (F.D.A.) AND CANCER DOCTORS REFUSE TO RECOGNIZE THE VALIDITY OF ALTERNATIVE (OR INTEGRATIVE) ONCOLOGY, IS THIS A NEGATION OF SCIENCE AND A DEVIATION FROM THE STANDARD OF CARE?
By Christian Pierre Joubert
VIS MÉDICATRIX NATURAE
WITH SEVEN YEARS OF CANCER MALPRACTICE PLEADINGS
Above, the “CANCER-FREE” Hunza People From the Himalaya, who have been closely studied regarding whom physicians have confirmed for a long time that “The Hunzas have no known incidence of cancer” (Dr Robert McCarrison, AMA Journal, Jan 7, 1922). In addition, “ They live well beyond 100 years old and have commonly been known to still father children at the age of 110” (ibid.), provided they do not adopt the “sad” model (standard American diet”) and stay in their paradisiacal eco-villages close to Nature: Some of their lifestyle conditions - no pollution and toxic stress, pure and alcalinic water and vibrant healthy foods rich in rubidium and potassium, clean & ozonated air, rich humus-topsoil, medium mountain altitude, exercises, sun, plant-based diet, with lots of fiber and apricots (eating the nitriloside-amygdalin rich kernel as well).
CLICK HERE TO GET AN ADDITIONAL GLIMPSE ON THE CONTENT OF THE BOOK
FOR A DVD DOCUMENTARY ON THE CUTTING EDGE OF INNOVATIVE ONCOLOGY SCIENCE, PLEASE CLICK HERE
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND UN-EQUAL ACCESS TO CIVIL COURTS WHEN OVER 80 PERCENT OF MODEST-INCOME CIVIL PARTIES HAVE NO MEANINGFUL AND EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE BECAUSE OF FINANCIAL HARDSHIP (I.E., NOT BEING ABLE TO AFFORD ATTORNEY FEES), IS THE "EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS" CLAUSE MIS-RESPECTED ? IS THE "EQUALITY OF ARMS" "DUE PROCESS" PRINCIPLE VIOLATED ? |
The best arguments from many years of pleadings from different lawsuits, including before two Supreme Courts.
By Christian Pierre Joubert
FROM THE BOOK COVER:
Virtually nothing in American law school training appears to focus on access to justice as a fundamental right. The United States Supreme Court's jurisprudence focuses on Bill of Rights phrases, in their interpretations of "due process," "liberty" and "equal protection," which are all derivative from, or secondary to, the most fundamental right: meaningful access to justice itself. One cannot reach the others if this primary requirement of the rule of law cannot be met. Yet, differently from most other advanced democracies, the American legal system excludes no-low-middle income groups from access to tort civil justice, reserving it to the well to do class. After having moved the Washington State superior courts, the Appeals Court and both the Wa. State and the US Supreme courts on this issue, the author, Christian Joubert, former law professor and plaintiff in different legal procedures, sums up the best of his pleadings on this Bastille issue.